Multi-stage grant evaluation

Evaluation committees don't fail because people aren't smart. They fail because the process isn't visible.

01Stages that matter

1. Intake validation - complete applications only
2. Individual scoring - structured criteria, comments attached
3. Committee review - aggregated scores, conflict handling
4. Approval - role-assigned final decision
5. Archive - immutable record for audit

Each stage needs: who acted, when, with what input, producing what output.

02Scoring without chaos

Structured scoring beats free-text opinions in spreadsheets. Criteria weights live in the system - not in someone's head.

03Audit trail as product feature

When auditors ask "why was this funded?", the answer should be a report - not a reconstruction project.

See the platform concept: Grants Platform

Request demo